Does truth exist? Does God exist? Are miracles possible? Is the New Testament True? Find out how the scientific, archeological, and historical evidence points to YES with Dr. Frank Turek streaming LIVE from the University of Vermont (Davis Center) in Burlington, VT on MON. 3/20 at 6:30-8:30 pm ET. This is a FREE presentation followed by Q&A and is open to the public.
I got saved by the Holy Spirit 6 years ago ! ITS ALL REAL! Repent! ✝️
@ha4641 Says:
The fact that the cornerstone of their faith is still being questioned and the answers are become more and more elaborate proves only one thing, Christians are lost at sea.
@nattybumppo4151 Says:
The trinity is from gnostic ideas and ancient greek philosophy.
@WebHead90 Says:
Nice
@dperkins01 Says:
Frank is being dishonest by minimizing slavery at that time. They were no bond servants, and they even had a way to make the slave permanent. If you trick the slave into having a family, then when he is free, the wife and kids are the property of the slave owner. The slave can keep his family if he remains a slave for life. Frank is a slick talker and sounds like a used car salesman.
@AcousticFatality Says:
I enjoyed where he was going with the conception example. Why was that cut out?
@NewtonVieira Says:
Amen 🙏
@jeffphelps1355 Says:
The Isrealites emancipating the servants would of been cruel. They would of been captured by pagan nations and made slaves. They would of lost thier means of providing for thier family. Being a servant in Israel would be equivalent to being free
@Generatorman59 Says:
Frank completely missed the point in Leviticus about slavery. In Leviticus 25:44-46, God actually permits his people to purchase other people from the nations around them. How is that not immoral? But he also permits his people to BUY CHILDREN of the strangers around them. Wow! And it specifically stated that they will be their property. It doesn't end there. You can pass your slaves on to your children as an inheritance and they will be your PERMANENT SLAVES! These children will never have an opportunity to be free. So much for the indentured servitude argument. How could Frank have missed this?
@SeattlePreachers Says:
also regarding Calvinism. they re define so many terms. For example they believe that when the bible says that God wants "all" to be saved or that Jesus "tasted death for everyone" that it means only all the Elect. Its damnable heresy.
@SeattlePreachers Says:
love franks explanation on slavery. Very concise and to the point.
@Theo_Skeptomai Says:
Hello. I am an atheist. I define atheism as suspending any acknowledgement as to the existence of a god until sufficient evidence is introduced. My position is that *_I have no good reason to acknowledge the existence of gods._*
And here is the evidence as to why I currently hold to such a position. Below are 10 facts I must consider when evaluating the claim made by theists that a god exists. To be clear, these are not premises for an argument concluding there to be no gods. These are simply facts I take into account when evaluating the claim.
1. I personally have never observed a god.
2. I have never encountered a person whom has claimed to have observed a god.
3. I know of no accounts of persons claiming to have observed a god that were willing or able to demonstrate or verify their observation for authenticity, accuracy, or validity.
4. I have never been presented a valid logical argument which also employed sound premises that lead deductively to a conclusion that a god(s) exists.
5. Of the 46 logical syllogisms I have encountered arguing for the existence of a god(s), I have found all to contain either fallacies or false or unsubstantiated premises.
6. I have never observed a phenomenon in which the existence of a god was a necessary antecedent for the known or probable explanation for the causation of that phenomenon.
7. Several proposed (and generally accepted) explanations for observable phenomena that were previously based on the agency of a god(s), have subsequently been replaced with rational, natural explanations, each substantiated with evidence that excluded the agency of a god(s). I have never encountered _vice versa._
8. I have never experienced the presence of a god through intercession of angels, divine revelation, the miraculous act of divinity, or any occurrence of a supernatural event.
9. Every phenomena that I have ever observed has *_emerged_* from necessary and sufficient antecedents over time without exception. In other words, I have never observed a phenomenon (entity, process, object, event, process, substance, system, or being) that was created _ex nihilo_ - that is instantaneously came into existence by the solitary volition of a deity.
10. All claims of a supernatural or divine nature that I have encountered have either been refuted to my satisfaction, or do not present as falsifiable.
ALL of these facts lead me to the only rational conclusion that concurs with the realities I have been presented - and that is the fact that there is *_no good reason_* for me to acknowledge the existence of a god.
I have heard often that atheism is the denial of the Abrahamic god. But denial is the active rejection of a substantiated fact once credible evidence has been presented. Atheism is simply withholding such acknowledgement until sufficient credible evidence is introduced. *_It is natural, rational, and prudent to be skeptical of unsubstantiated claims, especially extraordinary ones._*
I welcome any cordial response. Peace.
@sidwhiting665 Says:
Around the 2 hour point, when discussing whether it matters or not if the universe was created thousands or billions of year ago. I've thought about that a lot, and the part that I don't understand with an old universe would be how and when the curse came on creation. According to the Bible, all creation has been groaning under the curse since the time of Adam. Therefore, the curse was not in effect before Adam, and if we subscribe to old-Earth creationism, then this raises many questions:
*
1) Was there no death of animals or plants prior to the Fall?
2) When did humans become morally culpable agents who could sin against God?
3) Are Adam and Eve the first humans, or are they the first humans with moral culpability?
4) Were there other humans and/or proto humans before Adam and Eve, who did not have moral culpability?
5) Did creatures such as homo erectus and Neanderthals exist, and if yes, did they have a soul, or were they human-looking animals with high intelligence? Kind of a more specific version of #4.
*
Man was created out of the dust of the ground, and God breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and man became a living being. It makes me wonder if there were indeed highly evolved creatures that resembled humans in almost every way, but because they didn't receive the breath of life, they were not made in the image of God with an immortal soul as humans are.
@billmurray3264 Says:
Man if only Dr. Turek could come to Lebanon, I'll be the first to attend... Unfortunately, apologetics teachings and lectures isn't even considered a thing in my country
@alg11297 Says:
At 35:59 he says the Pharasees were the political sect. Actually it was the Saducees who bought their positions of the Romans, didn't believe in an afterlife, were in charge of the Sanhedrin and basically disappeared. Orthodox Jews are identified with the Pharasees who are around to this day. Please don't make factual mistakes like that.
@RoyalEdenel Says:
i agree with Caritina💪💪
@frankcardano4142 Says:
Do fulfilled prophecies prove a holy book is true?
@ericdumont610 Says:
He looks good when nobody can question him, put a few atheists with questions in the room and he's totally screwed like all these worshippers, there world crumbles when posed with questions 😂
@Lubbdubby Says:
I like Frank but to lead everting off with a story that Fox News or any other news organization can pick up and report for whatever political gain is abstract failure. If you use this approach with the political climate we are in, when you bring emotion of a death and the response of a president into the conversation from the onset, you narrow the audience and you are susceptible to being seen as playing and preying on the emotions of your audience. That was tactical and thought out, albeit poorly, and plays on not only emotions but allegiance to a flag before you get to God. Not well played brother in my opinion.
@1Ethiopia_Getahun. Says:
Thank you JESUS for the blessing of (GodLogic Apologetics) channel and (crossexamined) channel that helped me streingthen my faith ❤!
@lynnef9330 Says:
This is such amazing information. 🩸✝️🩸
@thatomofolo452 Says:
Atheist's are wack 🤧
@nataliocampos5156 Says:
Amen 😊😊😊
@NewCreationInChrist896 Says:
Read the Bible.
Allah, the Best Deceiver (Qur'an 3:54)
(Revelation 12:9) "This great dragon the ancient serpent called the devil, or Satan, the one deceiving the whole world was thrown down to the earth with all his angels"
LATEST COMMENTS