Once again, when I search YouTube for a video on something that is new to me, like this, I found you have a comprehensive video from a year ago! Excellent.
@DanBurgaud Says:
0:55 It does not matter if x86 and ARM is faster and better, the fact that these are Closed ISA, their corresponding government can throw the Ban Hammer and deprive certain countries from using it. My money is on Open ISA in general and RISC-V in particular.
@patriot0971 Says:
As more RISC-V dev tools are available, more polished software will enhance the ecosystem.
@Mario1vsSonic1 Says:
I would love to see you review Milk-V Pioneer.
RISC-V desktop that allegedly has good performance, however, it is a bit pricey. But it comes with 128GiB RAM and 1TB SSD, 64 cores, and some more goodies I think.
It costs around the same as a high end gaming desktop.
Is there a way to make a donation? I understand if around $2500 might be pricey to test something for a youtube vid, but crowdsourcing might pay for it. I am willing to donate some at least.
@CrackDavidson1 Says:
Imagination technologies APXM-6200 seems quite interesting as a board integrated with their GPU. Seemingly announced the day after this video went live. 😅
@Panacea9 Says:
Canadian trick with Germany.
The riscv with and without the lock was coded by Canada.
It is known as the arm chipset now. It is in a lot of mobile devices as it runs more efficient and processes much less heat.
It was tricked to be initially coded by Germany but with a revision and accelerator update with some code improvements.
USA was given the chip to look at for some reason. It had both the initial revision and updated one with a lock or 2 on it.
With the lock it would underperform Intel and and chips but without the lock it would work with less heat and be more stable without cooling.
The version given too USA even with the lock they found removed capped out relatively quickly. Though with the rate they release will still be around for decades.
The reason suspected it would be handed over us surveillance with the second suspicion that Canada could either improve the code and get it faster or there were more locks on it and it could be upscaled for 100s of more interations.
@Panacea9 Says:
From what I remember us a lot of USA asking About this as they couldnt fully understand the code.
So it was base code plus an accelerator.
The chip made by Canada was the code open source with a lock on it so it couldn't be upscaled past a certain speed.
They were asking about hardware locks and software locks. The hardware locks in theory could be bypassed easy if you could extract the code and put it on an open chipset.
The software lock could be a program string not allowing it to go past a certain speed or something to create an error, or increase error rate as it goes faster and faster.
It could be lots of things.
It could be more than one lock or lots hidden.
So they were asking if I was privy to this Intel.
No.
But they were able to unlock it past 1 or 2 simple locks they found in a day when they don't fully understand the code in the first place.
So it is a mystery to me if there are hidden locks that will give Canada an advantage later and backdoors in the system that would allow Canada to hijack all the arm based chips for surveillance.
@ConfuSomu Says:
Great update. Thank you!
@Panacea9 Says:
Esper ant o?
@happymelon7129 Says:
Acceleration coming... replace with RISC-V and also replace the OS, office app (very cheap /Free)
AMD, INTC Slip as China Moves Away from Western Tech
China officials tell telecom carriers to phase out foreign chips by 2027.
-->Gov office also in progress
This is U$A dream come true ..
China helping U$A to stop chip companies from supplying Chinese companies.
So great to see the two governments working together.
@Panacea9 Says:
Is this Canada or you helped with math to check to see if it could be improved?
It is an open source chip without that code used in the interface?
I am foggy and probably didn't have an understanding of it then.
@RichardLucas Says:
I wonder how hard it will be to purchase a RISC-V tower PC not made in China. And then, will I be able to install MINIX on it?
@suki4410 Says:
Since Arm and Risc-V are newer cpus, they use much less current, than the old cpus.
@raderator Says:
Looking forward to the day when Linux and Risc-V dominate home computing.
@backacheache Says:
Arduino and risc-v seem like a good match, I wonder how long it'll be till it's dominant in that market?
@backacheache Says:
RISC5 is very much needed now as ARM currently seems to be about monetisation rather than innovation. It's something Cory Doctorow predicts as the eventually fate of all big successful companies and calls the concept ensh!tifiction
@ps3301 Says:
Risc v has no chance in gpu. Why ? Not even amd has much market share in gpu. Risc v cpu may have a share in some tv, router or industrial market.
@ecdhe Says:
What would be interesting to know is the evolution of publicly available RISC-V micro-architectures (commercial or open source) and how do they fare against their x86 or ARM counterparts
@diuran1919 Says:
When will there be new powerful RISC in 2024?
@danielweith1075 Says:
It will be nice to see consumer electronics with RISC-V, Android is going to be key in the speed of adaptation and chip availability.
@ericwood3709 Says:
I had no idea RISC-V was a threat even to GPUs and NPUs for machine learning. I just figured it was a competitor to ARM. I hope to see it competing with desktop CPUs in an ATX form factor one day. I'd love to have Linux on RISC-V in a full fat desktop PC.
@cristianoo2 Says:
Im a big enthusiast of RISC V. Im sending my best wishes for it to succeed. I think inovative companies such as Google should try to adopt it as main processing unit. Maybe when building their own chips, they could help improve the tech
@mawkuri5496 Says:
its time to develop risc v for smartphones and laptops and for datacenters. in order to achieve that there should be free courses from basic to advance,for its development coz most people cant afford to enroll in their courses.
@RAZR_Channel Says:
Hey... Hey... Hey... 1M Subs... Knew you could do it man... Congrats.!!!
@alexrahardjazh Says:
Focus your knowledge toward China. China love to fund the open source standard of risc v its good for their business. And for the researchers its great for them to gain fortunes in China and break through monopoly, dual poly of tech oligarch . If you guys can work hand in hand with China the open standard and the open source of this architecture shall be kept just like Libux revolution in the servers and android the linux clone on the handheld devices. This will be greater if the risc v also can be use as microcontroller and as gpu processors
@stevencrawford6503 Says:
So not a RISC-y thing to bet on into the future 🤔
@PaulSpades Says:
I find it strange if RISC-V cores are being used as NPUs, because LLMs seem to work more efficiently with 2 and 4 bit weights. Unless you pack and unpack those in an rv128 ALU, you can't design really small and efficient logic units. And even then, AVX instructions in x86 are wider. So, what's going on here?
@auroraaa._. Says:
What's the difference between RISC-V & something like ESP32?
@VamosViverFora Says:
It’s not promising anymore. It’s delivering. Really excellent news!
@victorsmirnov876 Says:
Very useful, TY!)
@218cortex Says:
Kinda crazy to think that there's a RISC-V CPU inside my Google Pixel's security chip. It's a lot more popular than I thought it was. Great video as always!
@johnbee1574 Says:
Good stuff I’m thinking x86 might be facing a decline when facing new apple hardware and mobile devices so there may be a gap in the market also I hope they don’t just become know for micro controllers. I’d love a proper desktop solution
@walkman1269 Says:
This is so exciting to see.
@chriholt Says:
Definitely exciting times! It is amazing how much RISC-V has progressed over your annual updates. Seems like it is really picking up steam!
@koppadasao Says:
*PCMCIA!*
@JB52520 Says:
It's a bit greedy for Nvidia and AMD to be worried about RISC-V AI acceleration. What's wrong with being the best graphics (and CPU) companies on the planet? Even if they become quadrillionaires, it won't sate their hunger, and they'll have less urgency to improve their graphics technology.
@retropcscotland4645 Says:
Intel is phasing out x86 in favour of x64. I predict a grim future for intel cpu's since a lot of people including myself still use x86. Very good informative video.
@axl1002 Says:
Jim Keller's chip cough cough...
@rosomak8244 Says:
Are you seriously calling the instruction set from ARM reduced? Have you ever looked up any manual? No the intel mess is not a benchmark here,.
@celestialode Says:
Raspberry should go Risc V !!!
@AndersHass Says:
Hopefully there will also be great developer tools for RISC-V machine learning.
Perhaps even something to translate CUDA to make the transition easier.
The demand for smartwatch is also fairly limited compared to a smartphone, tablet and PC, so it does seem like the easiest market to begin in for wider regular consumer adoption.
Otherwise probably more so in countries with limited access to ARM and x86 that will more heavily push for RISC-V being used more widely.
@DoctorOnkelap Says:
riscberry pi time?
@martinsmith5028 Says:
Hi Chris. Always enjoy the annual updates. Interesting forecasts especially the idea of 2030. However, what's the chance of the next iteration of RISC being produced?
@RalphHightower Says:
I bought a TuringPi 4 slot motherboard and have two Turing RISC-V SOM with the RK3588 and
Mixtile SOM also with RK3588. Each have 32GB RAM.
@mohammedosman4902 Says:
thanks for the update
@danielsnyder6900 Says:
I have been "testing the waters" with Espressif ESP32-C Series dev boards which are RISC-V based. Environment used is the Arduino IDE and MS VSC with PlatformIO. Proves that RISC-V will be the next "unseen" micro controller in all the gizmos we use daily.
@macbaryum Says:
Wow embedded CPU.
Yawn.
@chromerims Says:
Sharing links to articles in your video description is a time-saver for your viewers. THANK YOU.
@cybercrazy1059 Says:
Would it be thinkable that nano 3d printer in the future can print semiconductor chip based on RISC-V? It will not be fast like ASML but decentralized
@lutrueson9000 Says:
The Lychee range are very expensive for what they are and they have so many cheaper alternatives to compete with.
LATEST COMMENTS