Keep fighting the good fight. . . That video is absolutely horrible!!!
Thank you for everything you do!
@Samudbhava Says:
i am building an underwater bridge from china to US. where vehicles will be put on anchored floatation devices and basically be pushed to their destination by wave energy. reaching speeds upwards of 100 km/hr in certain areas under certain conditions. it will reverse climate change in 20 years. this is in the ideation stage. i am looking for investors so i can live comfortably while learning animation, so i can create classy animations. i am like elon. i like to do everything myself. oh did i mention, we will be ready in 2025.
@jacekmarczyk4436 Says:
The resistance coefficient increase resulting from the air capture thing?????
@benkeller6027 Says:
If if and buts were candy and nuts, the world would be a sweeter place.
@arashputata Says:
Let me grab my belt and lift myself up of this misery !
@piad2102 Says:
When i go to the toilet, i shit out climatechange. Arrrr, there.
All good now.
I am de-climatechanged.
@damaliamarsi2006 Says:
I plugged all my power strips into themselves and since doing, so I have saved hundreds in electricity per month.
@theplaintech Says:
In this context, ASAP = Abysmal Social Asinine Parasite.
@sepo3451 Says:
You can clearly see that the ASAPscience guys love smelling their own farts.
@pbnaj Says:
No man can listen to a gay boy and take them seriously anyway.
@mirko1989 Says:
Guess who got to MIT and the degree due to DEI
@cr-qo3ov Says:
It's the same thing with electric cars they do nothing for the environment the amount of energy it takes to mine the minerals for the batteries the energy to create the car you've got to use energy to charge the car then you've got to use more energy to dispose of the toxins when the batteries run out of life they do absolutely nothing for the environment
@user-ob7ux5wh5k Says:
This was great
@csnipper524 Says:
Yeah but they are going to only drive it downhill, problem solved. 😊😊
@csnipper524 Says:
I love how these people are so sickeningly cheerful while trying to sell their obviously flawed ideas. You shouldn't be happy about being this dumb.
@seriousspikesam7770 Says:
Of course The Institute would be behind this. This must be one of the steps leading to synthetic people and coursers down the line.
@andrewbatts7678 Says:
I did an essay back in jr high on carbon capture as a possible solution to greenhouse gases. Even as a 12 year old kid I could tell that it wasn't feasible. I was given a D+ for going against the narrative that was being pushed by my school. This was during earth day week and I was supposed to write about how awesome carbon capture was. But I couldn't, it just wasn't there. And even 30 years later the technology still isn't viable
@CouchesCoroner Says:
I'm curious - if a train is going to be running anyway and then they used the regenerative braking as it would be running and breaking anyway so it's "technically" not using more energy to get the brake energy
@Rehteal Says:
I've watched some of ASAP's videos before on neurochemsistry, where I DEFINITELY lack the fundamental knowhow to call bullshit on. I wonder how much false info I was fed.
@DutchVilla Says:
Put the 20 houses on the train 🤣
@DutchVilla Says:
"So Karl Pilkington, what is your new amazing invention"
"It's a watch that tells you when you are going to die to the second"
"That sounds amazing, how does it work"
"You just pop it on your wrist and thats it"
@blackice9088 Says:
When you start with the assumption that an idea will definitely work, you are already lost.
@dmor6696 Says:
at least we have the oceans filtering our air
otherwise
we would be poisoned by methane, Co2 and stupidity
@peterhanahoe4913 Says:
Mr Thunderf00t, interesting video as usual, but not as usual in that it has left me questioning some of your assumptions. The carbon capture car would probably weigh more than 40 tons in my estimation could it be built but even if it came in at 80 tons, that would not be any big deal on a typical US freight train. These would normally average about 10 to 15,000 tons so adding another 80 tons here and there would not be a big deal. Also, the way they operate at the moment, they don't use regenerative braking as such but use dynamic braking as they call it, regenerative braking being more associated with electric trains which put the energy generated back into the overhead wires or conductor rail in the case of the London Underground. Therefore, as it stands at the moment, usually multiple locomotives will haul the 10,000 tons up a hill and would no doubt take a smidge extra fuel to haul 10,080 tons but they were going to be making that journey and burning the fuel anyway. Once over the brow, they then use their dynamic braking to keep the descending train at a constant slow and safe speed. With the traction motors now acting as generators and producing electrisity which has to go somewhere so is dissipated through resistor grids and lost into the atmosphere. Any thoughts?
@AarreLisakki Says:
well yeah, this takes the cake, I don't believe I've ever in my life heard of something this obviously dumb presented as science education.
@LordZontar Says:
This idea is akin to harnessing jet engines to spin wind turbines with the exhaust.
@newhavencon-py5yy Says:
One of the most common scifi concepts people try to shill as reality is using something that is not fuel as fuel.
Some people just don't understand that certain substances are fuel and everything else isn't.
It's not a matter of just looking at it from a different angle. Most substances just can't be used as an energy source.
@SalamaSond Says:
Surely a GoFundMe success awaits: all they need to do is put a sail on it too, and then use the solar energy to power a fan to fill the sail, then they can not even use the regenerative braking. Make your checks payable to...
@handlesarethelaststrawiquit Says:
He sure does say menacing a lot.
@DailyCorvid Says:
That guy looks absolutely mental. What apart from a mad crack habit causes ones eyes to go like that?
Yup he looks about ten times crazy.
@memejeff Says:
Yet somehow they made a video about greenwashing scams less than a year before lol.
@CainXVII Says:
This whole thing makes me feel like someone thought you have to move around to capture the air
@cinemoriahFPV Says:
We are nowhere near being able to control the weather. Therefore carbon tax is a monkey laundering scheme.
@robertmoffett3486 Says:
STEAM? The train will no longer emit STEAM? What (non- excursion) train emits STEAM? Never mind, steam from braking!
@neilcosten8482 Says:
Could someone comment on the electric side of f1 cars?
Specifically whether they are really just a marketing gimmick or do they really save energy re fossil fuels.?
After watching this video i'm beginning to wonder.
The batteries add more weight and they are being charged ultimately from the ICE. Also they are removing the mgu-h in 2026 so they are gathering even less energy.
Leaving aside the fact that they are trying to move towards green fuels which is a separate discussion, would it be more or less fuel efficient to go back to full ICE and dump the weight of the electric side?
@Itsbuckjames Says:
What's the last sensible option on the table
@jorgegalindo658 Says:
petrolium green propaganda
@ControlAllDa1337 Says:
I'm not a scientist but even I could immediately see all the glaring issues with this joke of a design. Beggars belief how a bunch of actual scientists got behind this. Thank you Phil for explaining the numbers behind the madness
@amp051947 Says:
Some trains have more than one locomotive can be up to 4 or 5 so what happens to the exhaust of the other locomotives. You put one capture car behind each locomotive?
@justinfowler2857 Says:
Homer Simpson, "IN THIS HOUSE WE OBEY THE LAWS OF THERMODYNAMICS!!"
@PownyRider Says:
I pay, what i pay. I'm not in charge
@multicyclist Says:
ASAPScience is just another moron. You see this type of stupidity all over YouTube, and people believe their garbage. Thankfully there is a channel like yours! . Otherwise, I think my head would explode.
@arposkraft3616 Says:
Not to mention the goal is unneeded even if you take the worst case prediction models, mitigation is in many terms a lot better then so called prevention of co2
@4dirt2racer0 Says:
the way he talks along with the hyperactive hands is a lil much for me.. It was hard to concentrate on what he was saying
@johngreg8910 Says:
I have a new carbon capture technology. I call it “trees”. I the government can give me several billion in grants, I would love to help them develop this awesome carbon capture technology for the planet.
@drumunism3781 Says:
OMG the air capture system instead of just using a pipe 😂😭proves the authority worship of this society has no merit.
@michamalinowski8015 Says:
Isn't regenerative braking in itself a clearn source of energy? Why use that energy on carbon capture when you can use that to power the train instead of fossil fuel based energy from the grid?
@MRptwrench Says:
Correction: "We were willing customers"? More like we Still Are willing customers. Until every fake environmentalist-for-clicks&views puts down and refuses to buy more commodities tied to CO2 production it will continue to be so. Not gonna happen anytime soon.
@ericbrennemann7474 Says:
I love his expression when he tries to convince people of his bulshit while trying to look smart,
@jollyterror8834 Says:
Carbon Capture Technology: "Wooooooo!"
Algae and Trees: *Am I a joke to you?*
LATEST COMMENTS