Karl marx never spoke of some magical moral obligation or capacity by the ultra wealthy to cause emotional distress to the workers. his thesis was PURLEY economic.
@Quiconque-b2m Says:
I translate it to you:
Palpatine is an ordinary guy and Star Wars was the work about Jedies being oppressed oppressed and Siths being oppressors and Siths were shown bad because they are oppressors.
@marycurran3211 Says:
It's painfully obvious this jerk never read Capital.
@antoineofionnagain3113 Says:
Can't believe this clown is still around.
@mikep1556 Says:
Has he spewed on his shoulder? Good because now he knows how I feel when I listened to him.
@LesterThompson-ji4mb Says:
It's The DEATH Toll that makes it Bankrupt as a political system !
And yet it's wheeled out again and again , if it's not DEATH by Revolution it's DEATH by Famine and the enslaved masses have to be mind controlled , the misery must be avoided at all costs. !
@proudgoyimm Says:
What do you mean by Marx View? How would a view be expressed in a journal? And what do you exactly mean by envy, how would he be envious of a system that benefitted him? And what do you mean by by?
@zawadibnjalil5337 Says:
why is'nt he crying? you wuss
@JeffersonGamez-t8o Says:
The system he was scientifically studying did that not him!!
@jakw97 Says:
To everyone disagreeing.
Is not the devide made between capital and workers, called exploatation, and that material determination creates the practical chains that contain the system. Religion being the first and primary oppression tool.
So, Jordan is right?
Thereby,
@ywtcc Says:
So your solution is to sign everyone up for a variety of pre Lincoln restricted government Liberalism that's compatible with slave owning states?
One person's debts is another person's assets, that's not Marx's insight, that's been the case for the entire thousands of years of history of debt.
Which is why his kind of Liberal doesn't like that part of religion very much!
Why don't you tell the story of Jesus overturning the tables of the moneychangers, instead of bringing up this Marx guy?
@mosesasplund6891 Says:
Peterson prepared for the Zizek debate by reading the communist manifesto. Bro does not understand Marxist ideas at all. If you're gonna try to attack them, attack the actual ideas.
@turjyalaskar6312 Says:
😂😂😂😂
@efffiel6565 Says:
How on earth it is okey to allow someone a person, to own 1000 homes? Does that even makes sense?
@efffiel6565 Says:
That a lie it was NOT the economic axis, it was the ownership of the means of production, who owns the land, who owns the factories, and why? Thats the main question, it is an abomination that we use the state legal ownership rights that were used back in rome, a slavery state. That basically allows anyone who owns an asset or means to own it forever, and to use it as they so desire.
@efffiel6565 Says:
Lets start by saying that food and housing are not an asset thats an abomination, that creats ghettos and destroys society, saying that its exactly what deteriorates human relationships and lead many to drugs, housing, food and basic healthcare should be a right, once that is provided by the state, then in my opinión there is nothing else to provide the socialist state should only provide the basics for survival, once that is provided capitalist wont be able to exploit anyone because no one will have to choose between starving or working
@Telepathic_Monkey_Experiment Says:
Marx said that it is the structure of capitalism that incentivizes division and oppression, not the moral character of individuals.
@bretsalvatore2363 Says:
The only thing he ever read of Marx was the first few lines of the Communist Manifesto lol. Atleast that was the only source he could ever reproduce in a debate publicly.
@01_SPACE_C0WB0Y Says:
Equally as wrong about Marx as modern "Marxists" are...
@CymruHardd87 Says:
Marx didn't moralise you dimwit! He presented actual facts and then proceeded to offer a solution.
@freddiemercerful Says:
Marx admired the ruling class and considered capitalism to be revolutionary! Peterson has never read Marx lol he’s so out of his depth!
@naqeebkakar6716 Says:
I can bet this guy hasn’t ever skimmed through chapter 1 of DAS kapital .Yet he goes on generalising one of the most analytical and rigorous work of all time so casually . This is called the decline of academia.
@GabrielGarcia-u8v Says:
Marx and Engels were both very “particular” about HOW he wrote his manifesto.. there was never any Moral criticism, condemnation, or celebration of any Moral stance or belief.. they explicitly treated Morality is a category in society, subject to change..
But they were very specific about addressing capitalism and communism as a solution, and were very specific about using historical evidence to build conclusions.. not morality
@psikeyhackr6914 Says:
What do modern Marxists say about "Depreciation"? Are they censoring themselves?
Karl Marx used the word 'depreciation'
11 times in volume 1
35 times in volume 2
80 times in volume 3
of his major work but the automobile had not yet been invented.
What does depreciation have to do with planned obsolescence in a consumer economy? Where is the data on the annual depreciation of automobiles since Sputnik?
Notice that our brilliant economists do not say much about the NET Domestic Product. But they beat us about the head with GDP, Gross Domestic Product.
What is the NET Domestic Product & what has happened to the depreciation of durable consumer goods since Sputnik?
NDP = GDP - Depreciation
That Depreciation is Capital Goods ONLY!
But Durable Consumer Goods were added to GDP just like Capital Goods and Bananas. So automobiles and air conditioners get treated more like bananas than Industrial Robots.
The equation should be:
NDP = GDP - (Dcap + Dcon)
Dcap is Depreciation of Capital Goods
Dcon is Depreciation of Durable Consumer Goods
Explain the logic of treating Refrigerators like Bananas for 75 years.
Buy a car and it gets added to GDP.
Drive the car around a great deal and it slowly wears out, it DEPRECIATES!
BUT, if that car is a Consumer Good our brilliant economists do not subtract that Depreciation to compute NDP.
How many hundreds of millions of Automobiles have had their depreciation ignored since 1950?
This was not Marx's problem since automobiles had not been invented. Even John Maynard Keynes never saw a television commercial for an automobile.
So how do we cope with our techno-wargame culture while techno-illiterate economists fail to get their Algebra correct?
@Tenoch-p1d Says:
Karl J E W I S H Marx.
@seanbuskey357 Says:
Dude never even read Marx.
@CaroRományoga Says:
Moral? You are jyst a sophist, a intelectual fraud. Feel so sorry fornthe people her that never read marx in trurh...
@CaroRományoga Says:
Pseudo profesor😂 never read marx
@Histoiredulivre Says:
Oh my god stay in your lane
@WillDasag Says:
The Working Class morality is base on their principles
Be not a burden!
Be independent!
Be practical!
Be counted!
Be educated!
Morality is that law on how to behave and treat each other as human and Christian morality seems to serve the purpose, but Marx saw this as all hypocrisy, while the Working Class see themselves as the "human being" they want us to be like them, to be "just" a human being by way of their principles.
And I understand them, believe them, and I will follow.
Christian morality will not make anyone a human being instead it is creating a god, while the Working Class morality will make us all human.
@tanders3441 Says:
What a bullshit mr peterson. You have such intellectual façade. You should not talk about things you understand.
@Potato_Inspector Says:
What's up with his weird suites?
@Urm0mz Says:
Moral virtue of the oppressed would mean that there is NO moral value in oppressing others
You literally proved his "statement" is something to....disagree with
@BillyBob123xyz Says:
I really don't think he has read Marx
@AmzHorrorStoriez Says:
He’s so wrong.. he use to seem so intelligent and credible
@thiccbaby2967 Says:
All the Karl haters talking about how he wrote this out of anger. When it reads as the most thought out work of literature next to buddhist teachings and Confucius books. To put simply the bs is real and yes they laugh about us at breakfast being served hand and foot with loads of entitlement. They hate marx words not because they are lies. Because they show truth.
@Realme-s2w1e Says:
AI views.,
@jeganofsathyabama Says:
I wanna know what this gentleman thinks of the other reasons for modern day suffering. ?
@natej1026 Says:
That moment when you manage to misunderstand Marx more than anyone ever has.
@DavidBayili-y1c Says:
I’m dangerously confident now. Thanks a lot.
@ouroborosnagyok9306 Says:
bro wtf are you wearing
@avian8354 Says:
Bro never read marx
@apex9806 Says:
So he claims one thing but doesn't believe in it? What?
@veselsvocal Says:
Another terrible video. I wish my timeline would stop showing your face and misinformed opinions.
@artificial-frequencies Says:
Marx was mentally challenged… just as all his followers
LATEST COMMENTS