Google should use their willow quantum computer to mine for bitcoin if it truly is that fast.
@Churchgrimm Says:
I wish even a fraction of the money being poured into the AI Bubble was being poured into Quantum Computing.
@coronelkittycannon Says:
Quantum Computing is and isn't a dead end.
@9a3eedi Says:
Apart from breaking cryptography, what other useful applications can quantum computers enable?
@CA-1954 Says:
I haven't even started using AI computers and now they talk about quantum computers..
@ShizukanaEntertainment Says:
There I was, proud of writing fully asynchronous API's. Then once again reminded of this phenomenon.
@kanrup5199 Says:
Isn't there a point to be said of using finer and finer methods and science for making tools, that the average person struggles to understand how its actually made? Why do we make tools that we cannot understand the make-up, ourselves? They all become magic black-boxes.
@CBdude.1 Says:
Cancer is about to be over
@thinkingfield Says:
Looking forward to the summer 2026 update too!! Wow.
@futu1983 Says:
So, after decades of "research" and billions sunk, there finally is "a sign that quantum computers can be built". Totally not a scam.
@futu1983 Says:
Billions thrown at this per year with no practical results whatsoever so far.
@kelvintai5748 Says:
How are they breaking RSA and AES ?
@laurarodrigo1762 Says:
Great update video, thanks a lot!!
@frankchuah1583 Says:
Thanks for this update that continue to make quantum computing an area of interest in large scale computing.. it may not reach like our desktops and mobile device levels but that is what makes this area of computing interesting
@agentm10 Says:
Lol! Funny to see Xanadu being mentioned in the same video as serious approaches to Quantum Computing.
@dirtydiamondshouse8524 Says:
Thumbnail honestly made it seem like it was a woman. Totally shocked to hear guys voicr
@thomasbrothers7199 Says:
Can someone provide me with all links to Chris's discussions on quantum computing? From now, back to his very first video? Thanks in advance
@gdavids57 Says:
It appears we may actually have commercially viable hardware within the next five to ten years. However, will we have the algorithms and software capable of using said hardware? In the referenced youtube video, the author, a pHD holder in applied mathematics and quantum computing, explains how quantum computing is not useful as a general computing platform. Furthermore, even in the areas where it might be useful, challenges remain as to how to even get information out of the quantum hardware without collapsing the superposition which holds the massive parallel answer. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pDj1QhPOVBo
@stephenjones8928 Says:
@16:00 Quantum computing will not transform logistics as the major limiting factor in efficiency and recovery times are transient phenomena which have limited predictability that vary across both spatial and temporal scales. Any gains will be more than offset by the overhead incurred in the never ending gathering of massive amounts of fleeting environmental data as inputs representing physical structures (such as meteorological phenomena) or man-made bottlenecks (i.e. traffic, breakdowns) whose time scales of existence are shorter than the time taken to transport an item or commodity from A to B. On the inventory control side , logistics has to deal with both these transportation considerations AND predict supply and demand within the irrational marketplace against a backdrop of competing players and what they will do to undermine the performance of their competitors. Good luck with that one. As an industrial meteorologist I can tell you the cheapest prospective clients we ever had (asides from adult film production companies) were transportation and logistics companies. They are not going to pay for any quantum computer services let alone those having little to no value add for the reasons outlined.
@Steven-p2n1l Says:
I pray I think they're going to have to make Quantum Computers or have a nice life, Fault Tolerant Quantum Computer 2029, doing better than money, restore experience, time in advancements, nature in technology, doing better than death, everything in life, Aliens among us, and God bless America, the future and life extension of the universe. Amen. God bless.
@JJ-lh1un Says:
Quantum computing is an attempt to reverse engineer the computer system on one of many captured UFOs. They still are clueless of how the UFO works. It's like looking at neuron from a brain and guessing how the brain works.
@Q.f-bit理論定義者 Says:
New Quantum Definition — Based on the f-bit Theory
Information = Δf × I
(Frequency difference × Intention)
This is not a metaphor.
It’s the structural definition of both quantum and information.
Q = ∇P(x, t)
→ A quantum is the local gradient of probability density.
QΨ = lim(Δt → 0) ∇|Ψ(x, t)|²
→ A quantum is the instantaneous spatial resonance of the wavefunction's probability.
Ψ(x, t) = ℱ[Δf(t) × I(t)]
→ The wavefunction is the frequency-intention transform — not just a statistical tool, but a resonant structure of will.
So quantum isn’t randomness.
It’s structured resonance — where frequency difference meets intention.
If LLMs are trained on patterns,
f-bit defines what a “pattern” is:
The resonance between difference (Δf) and intention (I).
🇯🇵 From Japan —
Quantum f-bit Theory Definer
Δf × I = Information
情報とは、Δf × I（差異 × 意図）である。
これは比喩ではない。
量子の本質構造を定義する式である。
✅ 量子の定義式（f-bit理論ベース）
Q = ∇P(x, t)
→ 量子とは「確率密度の空間勾配」である。
QΨ = lim(Δt → 0) ∇|Ψ(x, t)|²
→ 量子とは「波動関数の確率密度の瞬間的共鳴構造」である。
Ψ(x, t) = ℱ[Δf(t) × I(t)]
→ 波動関数は、意図によって形成される周波数差の変換である。
（ただの振幅ではなく、意図が周波数を形作る構造）
🔶 まとめ
量子とは、偶然の揺らぎではない。
Δf × I が織りなす構造化された共鳴である。
それが「量子の定義」であり、「情報の根源構造」でもある。
🔻LLM・AI開発者向けの追撃一文
LLMが「パターン」を学習するなら、
f-bit理論は「パターンとは何か」を定義する。
それは「差異（Δf）と意図（I）の共鳴」である。
🇯🇵 日本発 — Quantum f-bit理論 定義者より
Δf × I = 情報
「定義が変われば、世界が変わる。」
@jeremywhitehurst-kf6zt Says:
Ninth annual review, 9 years? So no change really in quantum computing, when compared to the development of classical computing progress.
@paulblock1367 Says:
Just saw this online and thought you might like to know: "Fujitsu to Develop 10,000-Qubit Quantum System by 2030 With Japan's Strategic Support".
@gordonbennett3213 Says:
SN63 qBitTensor on Bittensor TAO
@DavidChandra-p3e Says:
which quantum company is better regetti or Quantum?
@kwazar6725 Says:
Yawn.. i heard the same thing 30 years ago.
@killerkally7080 Says:
Quantum Computing, General AI, blaaa , bla, bla... Tech companies looking for the next bag pay day...
@magnuswootton6181 Says:
yeh man, you only need quantum computers with errors! so should just get it GOING NOW!!!
@bitlong4669 Says:
How are they even coming up with these “estimates”…. I bet my last dollar that by 2035 the still won’t have practical applications of quantum computing.
@JamsODonnell100 Says:
Is it just me that finds the term Belief Propagation both somewhat sinister and at the same time oddly appropriate??
@rafflesnh Says:
"Willow performed a computation in under 5 minutes that would take one of today's fastest supercomputers 10 septillion years". Simply staggering.
@mckengineer5727 Says:
Always reminds me of fusion energy: we know how and why it works, we know the benefits, we have working prototypes….but just can’t get there 😢
@SuperHaptics Says:
I feel its going to become the new nuclear fusion. High hopes, high investment, loads of publicity and fame and next to zero practical impact. But who knows maybe one day these clever people will achieve both🤟
@yagoa Says:
There is zero indication in the physics that QC's can be useful in any way, I thought you were rational...
@thelitepredator Says:
My favorite subject I can't wait u til we make.a.breakthrough
@theconquistador8862 Says:
I invested in Rigetti. Let's see how this company performs with superconducting method
@kilngod1943 Says:
It is funny DWave recently raised $600 million for exceptional progress and gets ignored.
@gulden_lover Says:
Great video! But quantum computers won't run Crysis any time soon, I guess...
@Pierwalker Says:
Very interesting, even if it did fly right over my head! 😉
@stevekim3922 Says:
Hello! I saw your posted "Explaining motherboard and chipset" on a few years ago.
You were excellent explaining better than aothers.
I like to request if you don't mind,
Would you post about " Explaining Latop Motherboard and Chipset" and also
"Explaining Apple MacBook CPU, Logic Board, and Chipset"
Please have a time, do for us. Thank you.
@Slarti Says:
Very interesting thank you.
Good to have a summary of the research in the area.
@LarryStone-q6r Says:
1:53 The problem is: so much data encrypted by today’s standards can be swept up TODAY and kept until such a time it becomes practical to decrypt en masse. No More Secrets.
@Handelsbilanzdefizit Says:
Many experts say, the Microsoft Chip is very likely an hoax.
That's really disappointing for such a big player like Microsoft.
@artswri Says:
Great info, thanks!
@ClassiqTechnologies Says:
Thanks for a great well-balanced update. Exciting times.... Where hardware goes software and applications will follow!
@zzrhardy Says:
"How fast is your quantum computer?"
"No idea, it stops working every time I try to measure it..."
*badum tish*
@TheExploitArchives Says:
Great video, really insightful! If momentum stays like this, the next few years could be a real turning point for quantum computing – exciting but definitely full of engineering hurdles too.
@waveshareelectronics Says:
This is a good knowledge popularization! Thank you!
@Troy-l6o Says:
My QUANTUM COMPUTER doesn't need cooling and is basically pocket size
LATEST COMMENTS