Its like Apple watch without strap but with subscription
@channelsub1202 Says:
💚 No brain-rot edits here. AttentionLeak scored Score: 89/100 🏅
@ifcukin8mufc168 Says:
Autonomy and the late Mike Lynch had technology that did this 20 years ago .!
@ifcukin8mufc168 Says:
Wtf need does it fulfil ffs ?
@ksulfa Says:
The product Marques destroyed before it even started 😂
@shanet7511 Says:
So its a horrible smart watch that doesn’t do watch things, could fall off, doesn’t integrate, has no screen and doesn’t do most smart device things that require apps. 👏👏👏
@shanet7511 Says:
11:40 Its constantly working, its stealing as much private data as possible all at the cost of $700+24/month
@erinb4919 Says:
This review is hilarious
@kemoselimagic1479 Says:
Lol the voice assistant sounds unenthusiastic af
@FoxLexii Says:
They trying so hard to replace phone
@manikandanc4893 Says:
I got a vr headset for 30 $ which had good design but poor lenses.. no apps.. if you review it will be worser than this.. even google gemini gets some answers wrong .. there is an one dollar radio made from china. It is good.. i got four radio stations in LR, AR
@beningermany-o1n Says:
This woukd be great for blind people.
@Davwid Says:
This is perfect for blind people if it didnt take so long
@mich8974 Says:
Comunque la gestione dello scia in Iran era più violenta e sanguinaria di quella attuale
@Szymon-f6s Says:
oooooo so thig in thumbnail show price of what is on
@AfricaEric Says:
Why wouldn't you buy meta glasses instead
@MRboss11 Says:
"The Hillary Eclipse"
@AustinGT.P.R.H Says:
and wearebleglasses
@biswa-singh Says:
A phone is enough.
@virtual_angel0 Says:
Atleast they tired something new I hope in future we will get more fascinating and intriguing hardware ❤
@4partmedia Says:
0:18 makes no sense..... Ofc glasses are "Wearable"... 🤔🤦♂️
@dustinsnoddy9883 Says:
They didn't connect it to the phone because they had the completely delusional idea that everyone would run out to replace them with this.
@BlakHeart666 Says:
Never will I ever buy this junk
@womp6338 Says:
I randomly got recommended this again but it's funny how Marques phrases his questions to the AI, he uses weird, vague and grammatically incorrect language, like "what is the traffic" instead of "how is the traffic" and then is surprised when the ai doesn't understand what he's saying. I'm not saying its a good product I think it's terrible I just think Marques isn't the best reviewer.
@tommymyrvang3805 Says:
the company that made this very bad product. what do they say about this? do this product give customers the needs that other product dont? dont understand the purpose of this product when there are other products that do the same thing better
@cademillett7054 Says:
If it’s bad….why review it?
@stuartnicholson8615 Says:
A bit curious that the device and subscription cost was roughly equivalent to a high end smartphone purchase and cell provider account... Good luck, god speed indeed.
@somerandomfinn668 Says:
0:18 wearable glasses???
@CeeZeeZ Says:
I love that marques listens to logic. He’s sprinkled in his beats for years now.
@birdofpassage9875 Says:
You've always said the same thing when it came to promised software updates on new phones so there's no surprises there. A lot of tech leaders are searching for a different hardware alternatives for the phone. I am wondering why they don't just go to the smart watch and smart rings that seem to already be fairly well established and fairly well received?
@dousc7579 Says:
What all these AI companies want you to do is forget how you likely already have everything their products/services could give you but infinitely better in every way. Plus, avoiding this rubbish reduces E waste, environmental impact, and how foolish you look. Never be convinced you suddenly need something like this, especially AI, because billionaires want more money.
@Alster123456 Says:
Wearable glasses is crazy 😂😂😂
@ruriyodk Says:
when it has cool features but overall trash as a product 😭😂
@a_true_mughal Says:
6:58 the Snapchat spectacles in the background
@Meckleys Says:
nice lmao
@Unimog-h9o Says:
Pretty cool
@nuelzsantana Says:
I emailed this product to Barbara from Shark tank just to hear her say IM OUT
@superhero2009 Says:
ba dute drecu de cyborg
@Doggieman1111 Says:
AI devices are all about monitoring your behavior so it can be aggregated with others. The CEOs of the world want to use that aggregated data to better predict -- and profit from -- future behavior.
@SatoruGeto-q7m Says:
So its suppose to do everything my phone already does ? And it can’t… but it’s 700 dollars 👀
@jkshenwy22 Says:
creative still and at least protects your privacy without need for phone
@lightsrage1985 Says:
I hate to say this, but that price tag is the average blind person's monthly income. so no they should not have priced it higher, and the projector function wouldn't have helped most of us. neither would the fact that now its a brick. meta ai glasses are a much more practical and b wont be a brick down the road at least if that goes down the gutter, i still have something to keep the sun out of my eyes and sparking a migraine because i can perceive light out of a tiny corner in each eye. so yeah. that is completely e-waist someone now has to find a way to rec ycle or something or it sits in a land fill and does nothing for a couple thousand years.
@KoreForever Says:
24$ subscription is a NO
@guderheinz Says:
This review was a lot more positive than I expected. I mean, it was an overall negative review, but you tried your damnedest to find the positives in the device wherever possible. Very refreshing, when most of Internet today is just constant mockery for cheap laughs. Nice work!
@NihaAzmat Says:
Best wishes bro
@Edenwaith17 Says:
I appreciate how fair of a review this was (despite the title being sort of clickbait). One could see the potential to this device, or perhaps integration with another wearable like a watch might be another path.
I can see a very useful use case where this device could be useful to someone who is blind to give a description of the area.
But like many products which were too far ahead of their times, the tech just wasn’t there yet to meet the promise.
@javagoblin1585 Says:
If Google/Samsung bought this and made it a Gemini/Bixby product, it would do gangbusters I bet.
@andrewevams1218 Says:
Ai slop as usual we dont want it 🤦🏿♂️
@404_Artifice Says:
Imagine if Spotify made you buy the app or the music you wanted to listen to then charged you monthly to use the app all the way to its most basic operation. People would freak. Not trying to give Spotify any ideas.
@kalpssays Says:
i like the concept, even though the product is bad - and can see several business usecases for this. may be someone will come up with a better version. this device should be a watch instead of a pin and connect with the phone, then it is an instant success
LATEST COMMENTS